ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00790
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In the applicants appeal for reconsideration, he requests his
reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without
characterization of service) be changed to a 1 code that would
allow him to reenlist.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 30 September 2010, the Board considered and denied the
applicants appeal, requesting his reentry (RE) code of 2C
(Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry
level separation without characterization of service) be changed
to a 1 code that would allow him to reenlist. A complete copy
of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E (with
Exhibits A through D).
By DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record,
dated 7 September 2011, the applicant submitted a request for
reconsideration stating if he had been able to remain in the Air
Force he would have been able to pass Air Force standards. His
test results from basic training are far above the requirements
to graduate. He desires to reenlist.
The applicant provides no documentation in support of his appeal.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and since no
new and relevant evidence has been provided, we find the request
does not meet the criteria for reconsideration. As the applicant
has been previously advised, reconsideration is provided only
where newly discovered relevant evidence is presented which was
not available when the application was submitted. Further, the
reiteration of facts we have previously addressed, uncorroborated
personal observations, or additional arguments on the evidence of
record are not adequate grounds for reopening a case. Therefore,
in view of the above and in the absence of new and relevant
evidence, we find no basis to reconsider the applicants request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00790 in Executive Session on 6 March 2012, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00790 was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 20 October 2010,
w/atchs.
Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 7 September 2011.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00790
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00790 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 1 code that would allow him to reenlist. The SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04957
STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 12 June 2012, the Board considered and denied the applicants request that his uncharacterized service be changed to honorable. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants separation and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. In an application dated 11 February 2014, the applicant seeks reconsideration of his earlier request. In addition, he request his RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02590 ADDENDUM
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding his request, and the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit G. During the processing of the applicants original case before the Board, the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) determined the RE code issued to the applicant in conjunction with his entry-level separation was erroneous as he should have been issued an RE code of 2C (Involuntarily...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01071
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01071 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code that will allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. They noted the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03186
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03186 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 1 series code that would allow him to reenlist. DPSOS states airman are given entry...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04238
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04238 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C (involuntarily separated with honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenlist. He humbly asks for another opportunity where he can serve our great...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02001
He was honorably discharged effective 7 April 2010 for unsatisfactory performance with an RE code of 2C. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS and DPSOA reviewed this application and recommend denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05652
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05652 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to 1J. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The applicant does not provide proof...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04725
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04725 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code that would allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard (ANG). An RE code of 2C is...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04212
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records the discharge to include the RE code and separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. DPSOS found no evidence of an error or injustice in the processing of the applicants...